Rural Teachers’ Teaching of Algebraic Functions Through a Commognitive Lens

  • Hlamulo Mbhiza University of the Witwatersrand
Keywords: algebraic function, commognitive framework, rural, discourse, teaching, rural teachers

Abstract

Rural contexts and their schools have continuously been overlooked by researchers of mathematics education in South Africa. This is despite the assumption that the educational landscape may vary markedly in rural areas compared to urban and township areas which have been solely researched in the post-apartheid dispensation. To address the dearth of mathematics education research located within South Africa's rural contexts, the study explored five Grade 10 rural mathematics teachers' discourses and approaches of teaching algebraic functions with five teachers from five different school sites. This qualitative multiple case study, using Sfard's commognitive theory, draws attention to rural mathematics teachers' classroom practices and views about the teaching of algebraic functions which is unexamined in the South African context. Three data generation tools were used to gain insight into teachers' discourses and approaches while teaching the topic. These are individual semi-structured interviews, classroom observations and Video-Stimulated Recall Interviews (VSRI). Research findings focus primarily on the data generated through classroom observations. To analyse the data, I use Sfard's commognitive theory to give meaning to teachers' classroom practices. Focusing on the distinction between two tenets of commognitive theory, ritual and explorative routines, the findings demonstrate that four participating teachers acted in an extremely ritualised way. The other teacher was more explorative in her classroom observable actions. The findings illuminate that teachers need to move more towards the participationist approach during teaching to enable them to think, observe, and communicate about mathematical objects that commognitively link more with explorative routines.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Afonso, D., & Mc Auliffe, S. (2019). Children’s capacity for algebraic thinking in the early grades. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 23(2), 219-232.

Berger, M. (2013). Examining mathematical discourse to understand in-service teachers' mathematical activities. pythagoras, 34(1), 1-10.

Brodie, K. (2014). Learning about learner errors in professional learning communities. Educational studies in mathematics, 85(2), 221-239.

Burns, N. and Grove, S.K. (2003) Understanding nursing research. 3rd Ed. Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders Company.

Caspi, S., & Sfard, A. (2012). Spontaneous meta-arithmetic as a first step toward school algebra. International Journal of Educational Research, 51, 45-65.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Descriptive statistics. Research Methods in Education Seventh Edition. London: Routledge, 35, 622-640.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating. W. Ross MacDonald School Resource Services Library.

Department of Basic Education, Republic of South Africa. (2011). Mathematics. Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement Grades 10 – 12. Pretoria. [Online]. Available at: www.education.gov.za [Accessed 12 June 2017].

Eisenberg, T. (1992). On the development of a sense for functions. The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy, 25, 153-174.

Freire, P. (1970). Cultural action and conscientisation. Harvard Educational Review, 40(3), 452-477.

Gcasamba, L. C. (2014). A Discursive Analysis of Learners' Mathematical Thinking: The Case of Functions. Doctoral dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa.

Guthrie, G. (2011). The Progressive Fallacy in Developing Countries: In Favour of Formalism. New York: Springer.

Hawes, J. M. (2004). Teaching is not telling: The case method as a form of interactive learning. Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education, 5.

Johnson, B., & Cristensen, L. (2008). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (3rd ed). Boston, MA: Sage.

Kazima, M. (2008). Mother tongue policies and mathematical terminology in the teaching of mathematics. Pythagoras, 2008(1), 53-63.

Killen, R. (2015). Teaching strategies for quality teaching and learning. Juta and Company Ltd, Claremont, South Africa.

Lotz-Sisitka, H. (2009). Epistemological access as an open question in education. Journal of Education, 46(1), 57-80.

Malahlela, M. V. (2017). Using errors and misconceptions as a resource to teach functions to grade 11 learners (Doctoral dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Science, School of Science Education).

Mbatha, T. (2014) Experiences of Foundation Phase teachers qualified in a dual medium programme. Per Linguam: a Journal of Language Learning Per Linguam: Tydskrif vir Taalaanleer 30(2) pp.37-50.

Mbhiza, H. W. (2019). Using video-stimulated recall interviews: teachers’ reflections on the teaching of algebraic functions in rural classrooms. The Independent Journal of Teaching and Learning, 14(2), 92-107.

Moalosi, S. S. (2014). Enhancing teacher knowledge through an object-focused model of professional development (Doctoral dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand, School of Education, South Africa).

Moeti, M. P. (2015). Investigation into competent teachers’ choice and use of examples in teaching algebraic functions in Grade 11 in South African context: a case of two teachers (Doctoral dissertation).

Molefe, N., & Brodie, K. (2010). Teaching mathematics in the context of curriculum change. Pythagoras, 2010(71), 33.

Moloi, T. (2013). The teaching of mathematics in rural learning ecology using Morabaraba game (board game) as an example of indigenous games. International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research, 60, 124.

Mpofu, S., & Pournara, C. (2018). Learner participation in the functions discourse: A focus on asymptotes of the hyperbola. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(1), 2-13.

Mudaly, V., & Mpofu, S. (2019). Learners' Views on Asymptotes of a Hyperbola and Exponential Function: A Commognitive Approach. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 77(6), 734-744.

Mugwagwa, T. M. (2017). The influence of using computers to remedy learner errors and misconceptions in functions at grade 11 (Doctoral dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand, School of Education).

Muir, T., & Beswick, K. (2007). Stimulating Reflection on Practice: Using the Supportive Classroom Reflection Process. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 8, 74-93.

Nachlieli, T., & Tabach, M. (2019). Ritual-enabling opportunities-to-learn in mathematics classrooms. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 101(2), 253-271.

Nieuwenhuis, J. (2007). Qualitative research designs and data gathering techniques. First steps in research, 69-97.

Nkambule, T. C. (2017). Student teachers’ perceptions of a Wits rural teaching experience project: What to learn and improve. South African Journal of Higher Education, 31(1), 191-206.

Nkambule, T., & Mukeredzi, T. G. (2017). Pre-service teachers’ professional learning experiences during rural teaching practice in Acornhoek, Mpumalanga Province. South African Journal of Education, 37(3), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v37n3a1371

Omodan, B. I. (2019). Democratic Pedagogy in South Africa: A Rethinking Viewpoint for knowledge Construction. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 10(2), 188-203.

Renkl, A. (2017). Learning from worked-examples in mathematics: students relate procedures to principles. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49(4), 571-584.

Sahabuddin, C. (2016). Hubungan Komunikasi Belajar Mengajar terhadap Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan Negeri I Kabupaten Majene. Pepatudzu: Media Pendidikan dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 10(1), 17-30.

Schoenfeld, A. H. (2012). Problematising the didactic triangle. ZDM Mathematic Education, 44(5), 587-599.

Sfard, A. (2006). Participationist discourse on mathematics learning. In New mathematics education research and practice (pp. 153-170). Brill Sense.

Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematising. Cambridge University Press.

Sfard, A. (2013). Almost 20 years after: Developments in research on language and mathematics. Review of JN Moschkovich (Ed.)(2010) Language and mathematics education: Multiple perspectives and directions for research. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(2), 331-339.

Sfard, A. (2015). Learning, commognition and mathematics. The Sage handbook of learning, 129-138.

Sierpinska, A. (1992). Theoretical perspectives for development of the function concept. The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy, MAA Notes, 25, 23-58.

Sullivan, G. M. (2011). A primer on the validity of assessment instruments. Journal of graduate medical education, 3(2), 119.

Swarthout, M. B., Jones, D., Klespis, M., & Cory, B. (2009). Sneaking a Peek at Students' Understanding of Functions: Why Not Concept Maps?. Ohio Journal of School Mathematics, (60), 24-28.

Trigueros, M., & Martínez-Planell, R. (2010). Geometrical representations in the learning of two-variable functions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73(1), 3-19.

Venkat, H., Adler, J., Rollnick, M., Setati, M., & Vhurumuku, E. (2009). Mathematics and science education research, policy and practice in South Africa: What are the relationships?. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(sup1), 5-27.

Voigt, J. (1994). Negotiation of mathematical meaning and learning mathematics. Educational studies in mathematics, 26(2), 275-298.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Socio-cultural theory. Mind in society, 6, 52-58.

Zegwaard, K. E., Campbell, M., & Pretti, T. J. (2017). Professional identities and ethics: The role of work-integrated learning in developing agentic professionals. In Work-integrated learning in the 21st Century. Emerald Publishing Limited.

Published
2021-03-24
How to Cite
Mbhiza, H. (2021). Rural Teachers’ Teaching of Algebraic Functions Through a Commognitive Lens. INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF RURAL AND COMMUNITY STUDIES, 3(1), 10-20. https://doi.org/10.51986/ijrcs-2021.vol3.01.02